For the fifth straight week, I picked more losers than
winners. This has become academic. If you just look at how amateur my logic,
knowledge, and acumen for gambling is, and spotted this at week one, you could
have taken every pick I made and bet the farm on the opposite. Last week I was
5-8. For the season, my record is 16-34-2.
That means that if you bet every game at even money on the
Houston Astros this year, you’d have more success than I’ve had picking NFL
games this year. It also means that you would have had better luck picking
the Sacramento Kings every night last season in the NBA.
It means that if you decided to bet just $5 per game in week
one, and then double that amount in week two upon seeing that you lost, and
then double that amount upon seeing that you lost in week three, and then
double that amount upon seeing that you lost in week four, and that double that
amount upon seeing that you list in week five that you would be down $585.
Or, if you prefer the glass half-full, you are just four
more correct picks than wrong picks this week from being up $55 if you double
the amount per game again this week.
That being said, it’s time to lay down $160 per game and get
to work.
Oakland (+10.5) over HOTLANTA: This line opened at 7.5. The
world is way too high on the Falcons right now who I think could will lose at
least four times before this season is out. Tony Gonzalez is using the same
steroids as Raul Ibanez, but I still don’t think that gives him the right to
play as he has been. On the other end, the Raiders have had two weeks to
prepare for this game. Darren McFadden is healthy and hasn’t really displayed
much of yet. He will get it going in this one.
Cincinnati (-2) over CLEVELAND: Trent Richardson is awesome,
but the Browns did not get as much quality from their rookie quarterback in the
draft last year. The Bengals meanwhile are coming off of a disappointing loss
at home to the Dolphins. I would look for them to come out scorching on Sunday.
Done are the days of Ben Jarvis Green-Ellis fumbles.
St. Louis (+4.5) over MIAMI: Something about picking road
teams just has me excited this week. It makes no sense given how well home
teams played in Week 5, but this is the stuff that leads to being successful
32% of the time. Both teams had nice weeks last week, but I like the Rams more
because I saw more of their game. Again, 32% of the time I am successful. Even
the great Albert Pujols would take that.
NY JETS (-3) over Indianapolis: This makes sense. Young
quarterback going into New York versus veteran quarterback fighting for his
job. I think the Jets find offense from Wayne Chrebet and win this thing by
double digits.
PHILADELPHIA (-3.5) over Detroit: Michael Vick is a dog
owner again. He’s also slowly heading into the dog house. Anyone else see the
Vick turnover breakdown on Mike and Mike this week? He is making a ton of
mistakes. That said, the guy is better than this. If the Eagles play a clean
game, there’s no way they don’t cover.
Kansas City (+4.5) over TAMPA BAY: The Chiefs offense
couldn’t do any worse than they did last week against the Ravens, so Matt
Cassel’s injury is probably the best thing for them. Brady Quinn was 3 for 3 in
quick relief. Also, Jamaal Charles is back. The Buccaneers aren’t as good as
the Ravens, so I like my chances in this one.
Dallas (+3.5) over BALTIMORE: There is just something about
taking teams on a bye that appeals to me. Teams outside of Tampa Bay and
Detroit that is. The Ravens will still be without Terrell Suggs, and while the
defense hasn’t looked too bad in his absence, they could use him against a
clever quarterback like Tony Romo.
ARIZONA (-4) over Buffalo: The Bills have given up 97 points
the last two weeks. Why isn’t this spread bigger?
New England (-3.5) over SEATTLE: The Seawhawks’ quarterback
isn’t a good passer. Listening to Bill Belichick try to speak positively of
Russell Wilson, it appeared even he was not sold in the strengths of Wilson.
There’s no way New England can’t outscore Seattle.
NY Giants (+6.5) over San Francisco: Did things really
change that much since they played back in January at the same ballpark? Hakeem
Nicks isn’t that good.
WASHINGTON (-1.5) over Minnesota: Don’t think for a second
that the Nationals front office isn’t rooting for RG III to start, get some sort
of head injury, and then tell the whole city that they were justified in
exercising caution with their franchise’s most important player. It’s not going
to happen though. Minnesota’s run ends here.
HOUSTON (-3.5) over Green Bay: I picked the Packers to win
the Super Bowl this year. Consequently, I have picked them to cover every week
this year. I’m tired of having them fail me. I’m just tired period.
SAINT DIEGO (+1) over Denver: The Whale’s Vaginas are
favored at home. Peyton Manning has looked good lately, but the Denver defense
has been his greatest fuel. The Broncos did lose by 10 last week right?
No comments:
Post a Comment